Smoot and Burris
It's ironic that Harry Reid is the one warning that Senate Democrats will deny Roland Burris' appointment to the US Senate. In 1902 the Senate denied a seat to Reed Smoot elected from Utah, who was also a top leader in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Many Senators believed the Mormon church still sanctioned polygamy in violation of US law and questioned whether Smoot was qualified to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.

(No, this isn't Roland Burris)
As a Mormon, Harry Reid surely knows about this chapter in the long history of government persecution against his religion. Smoot was finally seated after four years of delay.
I've often thought about Roland Burris when people discussed possible Senate appointees and I think he's an excellent choice. It's hard to view the appointment by Blagojevich as anything but a kiss of political death. Burris could have said he won't try to accept the appointment without approval by Pat Quinn and/or a vote by the General Assembly. I hope Burris has a plan I haven't heard about.
As much as I hate to agree with anything Blagojevich says, he has a point about the General Assembly not taking action during the December veto session. They could have passed a law taking the appointment power away from the Governor and giving it to the General Assembly, which is how Senators were chosen for most of US history, or they could have called for a special election. They could also have moved quickly on impeachment.
This was already known as a do-nothing session of the General Assembly and once again the people of Illinois are suffering due to the legislature's inaction. The only ones who benefit from dragging out this fiasco any longer are Illinois Republicans running in the next election. This is one of those days when I wish we had a crop of independent downstate Democrats to take over the party.



















