It still isn't terrorism when Christians do it
I checked out coverage by the New York Times, CBS, Sun-Times, and Fox Spews. None of them are identifying the militia groups arrested over the weekend as terrorist organizations and none are giving Obama credit for this major victory in the war on terror. Bizarre.
That was the language used in national headlines after a Muslim was arrested for plotting to blow up a federal building in Springfield. That individual likely had no means to be a serious threat on his own and was heavily aided by undercover FBI agents.
What's being described as an FBI "raid" over the weekend involved an armed terrorist cell that posed a realistic threat. Why aren't they being called "would-be terrorists" in headlines like the Springfield plotter was? Are the press afraid of someone playing the liberal-media-bias card?
The majority of domestic terrorism over the last 30 years is from Christian groups. Usually, they're anti-abortion attacks. I for one, congratulate President Obama for keeping America safe. Some previous administrations have taken a more casual approach to domestic terrorist groups that are more in line with their own ideology.
Once again, people are forced to look at blogs and the alternative press for the plain truth.